 |
Manufacturing
Violence
By Liane Casten
As I finally put away all the lovely greeting cards
that had arrived during the holiday season, I thought how ironic
that half the cards delivered messages of peace. Do we Americans
truly yearn for peace and are we willing to do what is required
to achieve it?
William Blum, author of Rogue State (Common Courage Press,
2002), stated: “From the end of World War II to the beginning
of the 21st century, the United States has attempted to overthrow
more than 40 foreign governments and to crush more than 30 populist-nationalist
move-ments struggling against intolerable regimes. In the process,
the U.S. has caused the end of life for several million people,
and condemned many million more to a life of agony and despair.
“Although our civil laws prohibit murder, robbery, rape and
bribery, they do not keep us from intervening in and toppling foreign
governments, quashing socialist movements, or dropping bombs on
other nations, as long as those actions serve our leaders’
concept of the national interest.”
Martin Luther King put it succinctly: “My government is the
world’s leading purveyor of violence.”
The American public, by and large, has stood by passively or been
blindly supportive of these actions. Wes go about our daily business
with little concern for the havoc and misery wrought upon other
peoples. I list merely a few examples:
1954
U.S.-backed coup against democracy in Guatemala and subsequent
U.S.-installed dictatorships contributed to the deaths of 120,000
people over a period of more than four decades.
1961-1971
U.S. military involvement in Vietnam, which included chemical
warfare (Agent Orange), took the lives of more than one million
Vietnamese.
1965
U.S.-supported coup in Indonesia; large-scale mob killings in
the aftermath left an estimated 800,000 people dead.
1965
U.S. overthrow of the Dominican Republic government left 3,000
dead.
1970s
U.S.-sponsored terrorist war against the peoples of Southern Africa,
particularly Angola, led to the deaths and mutilations of more
than one million people.
1973
U.S.-sponsored coup in Chile against the democratic government
of Salvador Allende resulted in 30,000 deaths.
1975
U.S. sponsorship of the Indonesian regime aided in the slaughter
of more than 250,000 in East Timor—with the complicity of
President Ford and then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.
1980s
U.S. military aid to the dictatorship of El Salvador to quell
a civil war contributed to killings and human rights violations
by government troops and death squads; an estimated 75,000 people
killed during the 12-year war.
1984
U.S.-sponsored terrorist war in Nicaragua, using illegal guns
and an illegal blockade of its harbors, left more than 30,000
dead.
1989
U.S. invaded Panama, killing 8,000, in an attempt to capture George
H. Bush’s former CIA partner, now “enemy” Manuel
Noriega. The former leader is now in prison, prevented from revealing
his knowledge of cooperative drug dealing with the U.S. government.
1991
U.S. attacked Iraq, leaving a lasting legacy of death from depleted
uranium tanks and shells.
1970s to present
The School of the Americas has been teaching military men from
Central America the art of violence to enable them to control
and destabilize their own nations.
Buffeted
by euphemisms such as “collateral damage” and “soft
targets,” we have become desensitized to the steady stream
of human suffering far from our shores. Thanks to an apathetic American
public and compliant profit-driven media corporations that help
our political leaders spread their propaganda, our government can
get away with initiating unjustified wars and meddling in other
countries with impunity.
American society is deeply invested in war. It is a social, financial
and political part of our everyday lives—an organizing force.
Today, the U.S. is the world’s lone superpower. Our military
spending, at roughly $400 billion annually, now rivals the combined
total military expenditure of all other major nations. It is more
than half our national budget and comes at the expense of our schools,
transportation infrastructure, health care, rehabilitation of our
prisons, and the environment.
Our government has no compunction about increasing weapon sales
and military aid to the world. These are made available not only
to existing allies. In the wake of 9/11, our new policy is to arm
govern-ments that were formerly considered unstable or otherwise
off-limits due to gross human rights violations—now these
same nations are assisting in the “war against terrorism.”
One of the most disturbing aspects of post-9/11 arms sales has been
the arbitrary redefinition of dissident groups around the world
as “terrorists.” The 38-year-long civil war in Colombia,
for example, has been recast as a war between our Colombian allies
and terrorists. In the Philippines, “counter-terrorism aid”
has been dispensed to fight a band of Islamic militants, the Abu
Sayyaf Group (ASG), despite the fact that government analysts admit
the ASG poses no credible threat. In Nepal, counter-terrorism aid
has been allocated to help the Nepalese military quell Maoist dissent
despite State Department testimony that denies any Maoist connection
to Al-Qaeda.
The U.S was born out of revolution and violence. Consider the massacre
of the Native Americans, the enslavement of the blacks and the Civil
War. Our nation has historically modeled itself as a dominator/patriarchal
nation (see Riane Eisler’s watershed book, The Chalice
and the Blade) in which social structures and religious institutions
play a role in keeping the leader up and the rest of the group down.
We are structured around authoritarianism, not peaceful coexistence
and cooperation. This phenomenon can be seen in churches, synagogues,
public schools, and most social, business and political organizations.
We are trained early in life to be part of our dominator nation.
Thus we absorb the media messages and grand slogans without question:
“Others are the true terrorists. We are peace-loving people.
We must rid ourselves of those who have weapons of mass destruction.”
Never mind that the U.S. has arsenals of mass destruction that could
fill football fields. Or that we sold Iraq biological and chemical
weapons. Or that we trained and armed members of Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan
back in the 1980s when it suited our interests.
Violence stems from myriad causes; primarily from the very roots
of our commercialized society, inside our homes and outside through
our culture. Many have wondered why our society is so much more
violent than others. The reason is not just the easy availability
of guns, which are the tools, not the motive for violence.
I suggest that the U.S. media, especially television, plays a major
role in promoting violence. The media broadcasts countless violent
stories between 6:00pm and 10:00pm. Cop shows and crime stories
far outnumber cultural and educational presentations. Many entertainment
offerings such as The Sopranos glamorize violence—one
of critics’ most acclaimed episodes was about Tony Soprano
and his nephew sawing up a body before disposing of it.
A long-term study indicates that boys and girls who watch a lot
of violence on TV are more at risk of aggressive adult behavior
including spouse abuse and criminal offenses (Chicago Sun-Times,
March 10, 2003). Violence on television as well as video games and
toys that promote winning by annihilation have been shown to be
damaging to children.
On talk shows, many media pundits espouse violence over diplomacy
as a means of political problem-solving. Rupert Murdoch’s
FOX channel and Time-Warner’s CNN have been strong advocates
of war, both in Afghanistan and in Iraq. Competing for ratings,
each channel devotes much airtime to the endless punditry and sensational
visuals—selling war as entertainment.
Weapons manufacturer GE, which owns NBC and MSNBC, has promoted
war, sponsored pro-war rallies and numbed listeners with blind patriotism
through its media outlets.
Meanwhile, dissent is vilified or ignored. Clear Channel Communications—the
nation’s largest radio chain with 1,200 stations, half of
the U.S. total—banned the Dixie Chicks from their hundreds
of radio station playlists after the group criticized President
Bush for his support for a war on Iraq.
Although violent crime has dipped in the past years, people feel
more unsafe than ever. The media’s fixation on war, terrorism
and crime conveys a distorted reality. This is especially dangerous
when the media marginalizes certain groups and minorities—
heterogeneous communities can develop suspicion or fear of other
races or backgrounds.
Added to all this is the stream of unsubstantiated color-coded terrorist
warnings from the authorities. The public is scared into condoning
clampdowns on civil liberties and supporting acts of international
violence such as the Iraq invasion. Whether or not we directly participate
in it, continual aggression has become a recurring theme in our
lives.
What we have in America is a value system, a profit system and a
culture that not just permits violence, but extols it as a vital
part of our American inheritance. Michael Moore’s compelling
Bowling for Colombine says it all too well. We do not teach
compassion or empathy. We identify with the victors who achieve
their goals by any means necessary.
History
tells us excessive military dominance has always led into decay
as other values fall by the wayside. We corrupt and destroy ourselves
from within. We need to find a way to reverse this self-destructive
trend before we add our own country to the dust heap of the formerly
powerful. It may be only a question of time.
|
 |